HBW Insight is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Califf Nomination For FDA Commish Could Reflect Bipartisan Appeal

This article was originally published in The Rose Sheet

Executive Summary

After seven months as deputy commissioner for medical products and tobacco, Robert Califf has been tapped for FDA Commissioner.

Few would dispute Robert Califf’s qualifications to be the next FDA commissioner, so the biggest question surrounding President Obama's decision to nominate him is: Why wait until now?

The White House announced Califf’s nomination Sept. 15. If confirmed, he would succeed Margaret Hamburg, who left the position in April. Stephen Ostroff currently is serving as acting commissioner.

Califf’s nomination confirms much of the speculation that was swirling when he was named the deputy commissioner for medical products and tobacco in January.

Robert Califf


In his current agency role, Califf reports directly to Ostroff and manages cross-cutting clinical, scientific and regulatory initiatives for the drug, device, biologics and tobacco centers, as well as the Office of Special Medical Programs.

A world-renowned cardiologist and prominent researcher, Califf came to FDA from Duke University, where he was director of its Translational Medicine Institute and vice chancellor for Clinical and Translational Research.

He also had worked with FDA officials in several capacities (Also see "FDA Lands Califf As Top Deputy, Potential Next Commissioner" - Pink Sheet, 2 Feb, 2015.).

Califf was expected to be a commissioner candidate because he was seen as acceptable to various stakeholders, with the ability to understand agency and outside positions.

In a tweet posted Tuesday afternoon, NIH Director Francis Collins called Califf a “superb physician scientist.”

The nomination will go through the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee before heading to the floor for full Senate approval.

Committee Chairman Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., said in a statement, "Dr. Califf has impressive credentials. The committee will move promptly to consider his nomination. The FDA affects nearly every American and needs the certainty of a strong leader. I look forward to hearing from Dr. Califf specifically on how we can move medical discoveries more rapidly through the FDA and other agencies and get safe treatments and drugs into Americans' medicine cabinets."

Comments such as Alexander's suggest that Califf's nomination and the fate of the Senate Innovation for Healthier Americans initiative – intended to help innovative cures get to patients faster, similar to the 21st Century Cures bill in the House – could be inextricably linked, with ample opportunity for favor trading (Also see "Califf Nomination Adds New Dynamic, Maybe New Provisions, To FDA Reform Bills" - Pink Sheet, 21 Sep, 2015.).

But it's unclear how long the nomination process could last, if it's ever completed at all. Senate priorities and the upcoming presidential election may make it difficult for both parties to reach an agreement on even a non-controversial appointment.

Intern Before Commissioner?

The timing of the White House nomination may cause some head-scratching, but there may be legitimate reasons for waiting several months after Califf joined the agency to make the move.

Califf's time in the deputy commissioner position amounts to a seven-month internship in an FDA leadership role that ideally will prepare him to run the entire agency.

He also was allowed to get to know the key center and office directors, laying the groundwork for a smooth transition.

In addition, White House officials may have wanted to wait for Califf to break his industry ties before giving him the official nod.

Califf had to sever a number of consulting and other industry relationships that would create conflicts of interest in his work at FDA.

Even though he was working for the agency, for a few weeks Califf had to limit his interactions with companies and groups that he had worked with previously .

Will Califf Survive The Election?

Although recent history may not support it, Califf may be in position to hold FDA’s top spot after the Obama administration departs in 2017.

With little time remaining in Obama’s term, White House officials were not expected to devote much energy to pushing a nomination that, if confirmed, may not serve long in office.

But moving forward with the nomination suggests that Obama believes Califf carries enough favor among both Democrats and Republicans that he could retain the position no matter which party controls the White House – assuming the next president doesn't prefer someone else for the post.

Also of note is that Ostroff apparently was passed over for the permanent position.

Ostroff has not been with the agency long either, but was chief scientist when he was named acting commissioner (Also see "Acting Commissioner Ostroff Brings Infectious Disease Background" - Pink Sheet, 9 Feb, 2015.).

He said in months since taking the position that he did not plan any major changes in agency direction, perhaps an indicator that he was not expecting to be in the role long-term.

He also did not rule out becoming the permanent commissioner, but said he wanted to remain at FDA no matter who has the job (Also see "FDA Staying The Course Under Ostroff; Hamburg’s Concerns Will Remain Focus" - Pink Sheet, 20 Apr, 2015.).

Focus Has Included Trial Reform

Since joining the agency, Califf has focused on a few key issues, including clinical trial reform. Throughout his medical career, Califf has pushed streamlining the trial process to lower costs and improve efficiency.

Califf also said he wants to ensure that the knowledge of FDA’s veteran staff is captured and available for future generations (Also see "Oral History Of Drug Development: FDA’s Califf Wants Woodcock, Temple To Share Their Stories" - Pink Sheet, 10 Aug, 2015.).

The philosophy would appear to fit with many of the policy initiatives included in the House 21st Century Cures bill.

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

RS019657

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel